Is It True Hillary Clinton Is Under Investigation Again
Hillary Clinton isn't running for president in 2024. She hasn't held office since 2013. And nevertheless, I'd debate that given the outsized fixation on her even at present, she — non former President Donald Trump — is the central figure in conservatives' imaginations.
The latest correct-wing set on on Clinton claims her campaign "spied" on Trump during the 2016 campaign and his early days in part, echoing the long-debunked "Spygate" conspiracy theory, which falsely said the Obama administration surveilled him. Information technology's a merits that has Republicans practically airheaded, as was made articulate in a Trick News chyron Monday morn that looked directly out of 2010: "GOP Eager To Probe Hillary Clinton If House Flips." That evening, Fox News was however at it, outright accusing Clinton of framing Trump.
Every bit with and so many of the conspiracy theories centered on Clinton, not much roots the right-fly hype to reality.
Trump himself in a statement Saturday called this zero of a story a "scandal far greater in scope than Watergate" and averred that in "a stronger menstruation of time in our country, this law-breaking would have been punishable by death." Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told Play a joke on News on Sunday that Trump's statement was "right on target" — seemingly including the unhinged call for the decease punishment for Clinton'southward retinue.
As with so many of the conspiracy theories centered on Clinton, not much roots the right-wing hype to reality. In this instance, Clinton's enemies are harping on a certificate special counsel John Durham filed in court last week, related to the disturbingly weak charges he'south brought against a onetime Clinton campaign lawyer named Michael Sussmann. Trump'south Justice Section asked Durham to investigate the origins of the investigation into the Trump entrada by special counsel Robert Mueller, which hasn't turned up the conspiracy confronting Trump that his supporters believe exists.
In asking the court to decide whether the law firm representing Sussmann has a conflict of interest, Durham filled in the rest of the document with mostly unrelated details that make great grist for the conservative outrage manufactory. I'll spare y'all the nitty-gritty, but hither's the part that the GOP thinks is worth new investigations:
The Government'due south evidence at trial will also establish that amid the Internet data Tech Executive-one and his associates exploited was domain name arrangement ("DNS") Internet traffic pertaining to (i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump's Central Park West flat building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the U.s. ("EOP"). (Tech Executive-1's employer, Internet Company-1, had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as office of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP. Tech Executive-1 and his assembly exploited this arrangement past mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information nearly Donald Trump.)
Sounds shady, but Durham's filing doesn't leave the impression that this was whatsoever kind of "wiretap," every bit Trump had claimed, or hacking to "infiltrate" his campaign, as Fox News' headline put it. Even former Trump appointee John Ratcliffe had to acknowledge on Fox News that at that place was cypher really illegal about how that data was obtained.
Nor is there any existent connectedness to Clinton herself or her entrada, not in the Sussmann indictment nor in terminal calendar week'south filing. Instead, it'south former Trump lackey Kash Patel, not Durham, who made that groundless claim to Play tricks News. Patel also issued a statement using the word "infiltrate," which has become key to the current freakout.
Republicans dearest milking every possible Clinton scandal for all it'due south worth.
Republicans love milking every possible Clinton scandal for all it's worth. If House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., became speaker, he'd love nothing more to spend his first years presiding over the Revenge of the Benghazi Committee, a sequel that absolutely nobody needs. His goal would be getting "Clinton" and "investigation" together in headlines, which gets the base going, even if in that location's no malfeasance to uncover.
Whenever I write near anything related to Trump, particularly his ongoing efforts to subvert democracy and the Constitution, someone in an email accuses me of having "Trump Derangement Syndrome." I chuckle, but I'm struck by the irony given the Republicans' continued obsession with Clinton. Information technology nearly feels Dadaist at this indicate, a trip into the cool that will keep going until Trump has finally managed to "lock her up."
Clinton won't be on the ballot in 2024; Trump probable will. She isn't holding rallies and encouraging future assaults on republic; he is. Whereas Trump and his followers luxuriate in his ability to alive in liberals' heads hire-free, Clinton would very much like to be excluded from this narrative. Simply the GOP isn't about to let a lilliputian thing like "facts" make it the way of the strategy of going subsequently Clinton as a springboard back to power.
Is It True Hillary Clinton Is Under Investigation Again
Source: https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/durham-court-filing-doesn-t-say-hillary-clinton-spied-trump-n1289097
0 Response to "Is It True Hillary Clinton Is Under Investigation Again"
Post a Comment